AWPBI

What Complete Means for Each AWP Package Type

By AWPBI Planning Team · Updated Oct 2026 · 5 min read

Complete is fixed for every work package type before execution starts and written into the AWP procedure. An EWP is complete when every document in it is IFC, with no HOLDs or accepted HOLDs only, its MTOs meet the data requirements, its model attribution is verified and the reviewed package is transmitted. None of the eleven is renegotiated in the progress meeting.

Eleven Package Types, One Line Each

What Complete Means, Package by Package

PackageComplete when
EWP100 percent of documents IFC, no HOLDs or accepted HOLDs only, MTOs to the data requirements, model attribution verified, checklist signed, review passed, package transmitted.
VEWP100 percent of construction-required vendor documents received, approved, allocated and released.
FEWP100 percent of fabrication drawings issued, fabricator 3D model delivered and validated, package approved and released.
PWP100 percent of materials received at site, receiving reports completed, purchase order closed.
MWPModule loaded, shipped and set at site, carry-over work list accepted by construction.
CWP100 percent of IWPs closed, punch walkdown complete, quality documentation delivered.
IWPScope executed, QC verified, closure completed.
TWPTest executed and accepted, test documentation complete.
SWPAll remaining system work complete, walkdown punch items closed, system accepted for turnover.

A deviation takes written approval from the owner's AWP lead before it applies, and the table goes into the RFQ so every bidder works to the same definition. The package hierarchy entry covers the one-to-one EWP, PWP and CWP relationship.

The EWP Rule of Credit

EWP progress is documents issued IFC divided by total documents in the EWP, and credit per document is binary, so a drawing at review earns nothing. The total includes every placeholder in the master document register, so a late placeholder moves the number. As-built documents count as IFC, and VEWPs and FEWPs follow the rule. How rules of credit work covers the construction side.

The Two Arguments This Ends

The first is whether a package is done, and a package at 95 percent with three drawings on HOLD is not. The second is whose number is right, and with a binary rule and a fixed denominator two people counting the same register reach the same figure, so the meeting moves to the late drawings.

Writing the definitions into the procedure, the RFQ and the review checklists is part of AWP consulting, and the table and registers stay with the owner when the contract ends.

Questions Readers Ask

Related Articles

What Is Advanced Work Packaging?

A plain-language definition of AWP, why capital projects use it, and how it changes execution planning.

7 min read · Updated Jul 2026

How Workface Planning Fits Into Advanced Work Packaging

Workface planning is the last step in AWP, turning engineered scope into packages a crew can execute.

5 min read · Updated Jul 2026

Advanced Work Packaging Without a 3D Model

What the 3D model does in a full AWP procedure, what still works when a project has no usable model, and which controls have to be rebuilt by hand.

4 min read · Updated Oct 2026

Self-Hosted AWP Software with P6 and Power BI

What self-hosting AWP software means for project data, how it divides work with the Primavera P6 schedule, and how Power BI reads package data from it.

4 min read · Updated Oct 2026

Which Project Phases AWP Software Should Cover

What AWP software should hold from FEED to turnover, covering the path of construction, EWPs and PWPs, IWPs and the lookahead, testing, and system completion.

4 min read · Updated Oct 2026

What It Takes to Set Up AWP Software on a Project

How AWP software is set up from FEED, with the structures agreed before engineering packages, data loaded every week, the model link, and full-time leadership.

3 min read · Updated Oct 2026

How the AWP Package Hierarchy Maps to Software

The eleven AWP package types from CWA to SWP, who owns each one, and the rules AWP software has to hold for parents, one-to-one packages, and the register.

3 min read · Updated Oct 2026

How to Evaluate Advanced Work Packaging Software

Seven areas to evaluate in AWP software, drawn from what an AWP procedure asks of it, from building IWPs from the model to completing work by system.

3 min read · Updated Oct 2026

How Advanced Work Packaging Software Is Priced

The three parts of AWP software cost, which are the license, the setup, and support through execution, and what each one covers on a capital project.

3 min read · Updated Oct 2026

AWP for Brownfield Projects and Turnarounds

How advanced work packaging applies inside an operating plant, from the existing plant in the model and site-controlled drawings to MOC and turnarounds.

3 min read · Updated Oct 2026

How Owners Run AWP Across Several EPC Contractors

How an owner runs AWP across several EPC contractors with a standard set before contracts are signed, owner roles, one naming convention, data, and audits.

3 min read · Updated Oct 2026

The AWP Record Should Outlive the Contract

The AWP registers, the matrix and the readiness history sit in the contractor's system and leave when the contract ends. The fix is where the standard lives.

9 min read · Updated Oct 2026

An EWP Release Plan the Owner Can Audit

How an engineering contractor runs an EWP release plan an owner can audit, with four statuses, one rule of credit, weekly forecasts and a skyline.

5 min read · Updated Oct 2026

Placeholders Are the Earliest Warning an EWP Will Be Late

Why a short placeholder count eight weeks before an EWP release predicts a late package, who owns the count, and the weekly check that catches it early.

4 min read · Updated Oct 2026

What the AWP Matrix Is and Who May Change It

The AWP Matrix is the one controlled list of every work package and its relationships, owned by the owner's AWP lead and issued weekly before systems change.

4 min read · Updated Oct 2026

What an Owner Checks in an Engineering AWP Audit

The items an owner checks in an engineering AWP audit, when the audits happen, and the weekly routine that lets an engineering contractor pass every time.

4 min read · Updated Oct 2026

How EWP Changes Are Managed After IFC

The five categories of EWP change, the change notice that precedes revised drawings, and the re-transmitted package that keeps every recipient on one set.

4 min read · Updated Oct 2026

What a HOLD Register Must Contain

What every row of an engineering HOLD register carries, how HOLDs are accepted at the EWP review, and why a HOLD is released by revising the package.

3 min read · Updated Oct 2026

What a Document Allocation Matrix Does

How a Document Allocation Matrix assigns each document to an EWP, VEWP or FEWP when its placeholder is created, with an example and the rule on unassigned ones.

4 min read · Updated Oct 2026

The Lean Owner AWP Organization

The small set of AWP roles an owner needs from FEED, who reports to whom, the deliverables each lead owns, and where a partner fills the gaps.

4 min read · Updated Oct 2026

Why the Module Yard Is an Extension of the Site

Why module fabrication follows the same AWP requirements as site construction, what FEWPs and MWPs are, and the review two weeks before a module ships.

4 min read · Updated Oct 2026

When a Project Moves from IWPs to System Work Packages

When a project repackages remaining scope into system work packages, what an SWP contains, and why the lookahead and constraint process stay the same.

4 min read · Updated Oct 2026

What Model Conditioning Is and Why AWP Needs It

What model conditioning covers, from attributes per the data requirements and CWP volumes to an EWP-structured tree, tag checks, and vetted vendor models.

3 min read · Updated Oct 2026

See How openAWP Supports Advanced Work Packaging

Explore the product these articles are about, or book a live demo to see it on your own project.