AWPBI

How Owners Run AWP Across Several EPC Contractors

3 min read · Updated Oct 2026

An owner runs AWP across several EPC contractors by owning the standard and the oversight, while each contractor executes its own scope. The owner sets the procedure, the package naming, the data requirements, and the register of all packages, flows them into every contract, and audits compliance. The contractors plan, engineer, procure, and build by package inside that standard.

The Standard Comes Before the Contracts

The owner's AWP procedure travels with the engineering request for quotation, so expectations and definitions are agreed before contracts are signed. Its requirements then flow down contractually to every vendor, supplier, fabricator, and subcontractor. No requirement is waived verbally, and any deviation needs prior written approval from the owner's AWP lead.

What the Owner Keeps

Owner roleWhat it owns
AWP leadThe procedure, the AWP Matrix (the register of every package and its relationships), the package nomenclature, trackers, checklists, and audits. Facilitates interactive planning
Information managerThe data requirements and model attributes, the data warehouse, the project portal and dashboards, and system integration

Each contractor mirrors those roles with its own AWP manager and information manager, so every interface has a named counterpart. The owner steers, reviews, and audits, the contractors run their own disciplines, and workface planning stays with the constructor.

One Naming Convention, Frozen Early

The engineering contractor develops the package naming convention and the owner approves it. It is frozen before the first drawing issues and adopted contractually by fabricators and vendors, because late or inconsistent naming breaks downstream data integration.

Data the Owner Can See

Contractors deliver structured data into a warehouse the owner can access directly, with documents in the document management system and structured data in the warehouse. Data quality is checked weekly against the data requirements, and compliance is verified before each engineering package is released. What information management is covers the framework.

Audits with Consequences

The owner's AWP lead runs monthly process audits and phase audits at set points in construction, scored as a percentage of adherence. Repeated non-compliance leads to a written notice and a corrective action plan, and continued non-compliance can be linked to invoicing and progress payments where the contract allows.

How openAWP Supports It

openAWP lets an owner publish a standard structure for CWAs, CWPs, EWPs, IWPs, and tags, and start each contracted project from it, with contractors adding their own fields. Projects can adopt a published validation standard and are measured against it on every load. Access is set by role down to the table and tab, so each contractor sees its own scope, and openAWP runs on the owner's infrastructure or ours.

Setting up AWP across a contractor program? Our AWP consulting team writes the owner standard and the procedures behind it.

Related Articles

What Is Advanced Work Packaging?

A plain-language definition of AWP, why capital projects use it, and how it changes execution planning.

7 min read

How Workface Planning Fits Into Advanced Work Packaging

Workface planning is the last step in AWP, turning engineered scope into packages a crew can execute.

5 min read

Advanced Work Packaging Without a 3D Model

What the 3D model does in a full AWP procedure, what still works when a project has no usable model, and which controls have to be rebuilt by hand.

4 min read

Self-Hosted AWP Software with P6 and Power BI

What self-hosting AWP software means for project data, how it divides work with the Primavera P6 schedule, and how Power BI reads package data from it.

4 min read

Which Project Phases AWP Software Should Cover

What AWP software should hold from FEED to turnover, covering the path of construction, EWPs and PWPs, IWPs and the lookahead, testing, and system completion.

4 min read

What It Takes to Set Up AWP Software on a Project

How AWP software is set up from FEED, with the structures agreed before engineering packages, data loaded every week, the model link, and full-time leadership.

3 min read

How the AWP Package Hierarchy Maps to Software

The eleven AWP package types from CWA to SWP, who owns each one, and the rules AWP software has to hold for parents, one-to-one packages, and the register.

3 min read

How to Evaluate Advanced Work Packaging Software

Seven areas to evaluate in AWP software, drawn from what an AWP procedure asks of it, from building IWPs from the model to completing work by system.

3 min read

How Advanced Work Packaging Software Is Priced

The three parts of AWP software cost, which are the license, the setup, and support through execution, and what each one covers on a capital project.

3 min read

AWP for Brownfield Projects and Turnarounds

How advanced work packaging applies inside an operating plant, from the existing plant in the model and site-controlled drawings to MOC and turnarounds.

3 min read

What Model Conditioning Is and Why AWP Needs It

What model conditioning covers, from attributes per the data requirements and CWP volumes to an EWP-structured tree, tag checks, and vetted vendor models.

3 min read

See How openAWP Supports Advanced Work Packaging

Explore the product these articles are about, or book a live demo to see it on your own project.