Deliverables organized by discipline, not by CWP
Drawings, models, and MTOs issued by discipline or system have to be repackaged into EWPs before construction can plan against them.
EPCs and engineering firms sit at the front of the AWP chain: each CWP waits on its EWP finishing first. AWPBI helps engineering teams package deliverables by CWP, keep EWP status visible against the schedule, and carry design data through to construction planning, with consultants who embed directly in your project org chart.
Drawings, models, and MTOs issued by discipline or system have to be repackaged into EWPs before construction can plan against them.
IFC progress, HOLDs, and misalignment between the MDR and the schedule stay invisible until someone builds the rollup by hand.
The 3D model, the MTO, and the schedule rarely share package identifiers, so construction rebuilds data engineering already owns.
Package hierarchies, naming conventions, and client data requirements change from owner to owner, and every new project starts with rebuilding the package structure to match.
Why openAWP fits engineering consulting
Plan the work before the work starts
Break scope into constraint-free installation work packages, aligned to path of construction.
Release only what's ready
Work packages don't reach the field until every constraint (materials, access, permits) is cleared.
See status without chasing updates
Field progress rolls up automatically, so project controls always has a current picture.
You own the platform
openAWP deploys on your infrastructure, molds to your data requirements (there is no hardcoded package structure), and the software and data stay with you after the engagement.
Book a live demo of openAWP, or talk to our team about embedding data and development support on your next project.