AWPBI

What the Secondary MTO Is and Why Drawings Do Not Count

By AWPBI Planning Team · Updated Oct 2026 · 4 min read

The Secondary MTO is the detailed material take-off that expands an engineered design into every component needed to procure, fabricate, package and install it, delivered as a digital dataset with one row per item. Drawing tables, notes and bill-of-material blocks do not satisfy it, because a planner cannot filter, reconcile or allocate a PDF.

Primary and Secondary, Defined

The Primary MTO is the engineering-issued take-off of the tagged and modeled components, drawn from the models, the engineering lists and the drawings. It is the authoritative source of design quantities, traceable to the deliverables it came from.

The Secondary MTO is derived from the Primary MTO and from the standards, typicals, hookup drawings and installation details around it. It expands assemblies and standard details into the bulk materials, consumables, supports, connection components, accessories, fasteners and installation hardware the work needs, modeled or not. It is delivered per discipline as a structured tabular dataset, separate from the Primary MTO and revised on the EWP's cycle.

What Drawings Fail to Give a Planner

A bill-of-material block on an isometric gives a quantity for that sheet. It does not say which IWP the item belongs to, whether the item is modeled, what its catalog reference is, or whether a purchase order already covers it. The warehouse cannot reserve against it and the workface planner cannot build a field material request from it, so the readiness roll-up by CWP has a hole where the item should be. When the quantity lives only in a note, someone rebuilds it by hand, and the rebuilt number is the one that ends up in the argument. Material readiness depends on the row existing before the crew does.

The Fields That Make a Row Useful

A row earns its place when it can be joined to the rest of the project data. Each secondary item carries its quantity, unit of measure, specification, size and catalog reference, together with the EWP, CWP and IWP it is associated with, the 3D model GUID where one exists, and the parent tag or Primary MTO item it belongs to. Behind each row sits traceability to the engineering drawing, the standard detail number, the hookup drawing or the installation detail that generated it. Those fields let one identifier find the item in the MTO, the bill of material, the purchase order and the packing list, which is what the package hierarchy needs to roll quantities up from IWP to CWP.

One Purchase Order Line Supports One CWP

Procurement is organized through procurement work packages, each holding the material for one CWP and its required-on-site date. A purchase order may carry line items for several PWPs, and a PWP may draw on several purchase orders, but each purchase order line item supports exactly one CWP. That granularity lets the project compare supplier delivery dates against CWP need dates line by line, and allocate material by CWP before the CWP starts. Bulk commodities bought under common orders follow the same rule at the line level.

Standing up the requirement, the templates and the MTO to BOM to packing list reconciliation is part of the materials management service. The datasets, the catalog and the material records are the owner's, and they stay in the owner's systems when the engineering contract closes.

Questions Readers Ask

Related Articles

See Material Readiness on Your Own Project

openAWP tracks packages and their constraints, and our consultants connect it to the material systems you already run.